Shadow AI
Shadow AI is employees using AI tools that their organisation has not approved or cannot see: most often personal accounts of ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini, browser extensions, or AI features switched on inside other software.
It is rarely malicious. People use it because it saves them time. The risk is that company and client information goes into accounts, settings and records the organisation does not control, and nobody knows it happened.
The tools are good, free or cheap, and one tab away. When the approved route is slow, missing or banned, people take the quick one, often on their own phone.
Shadow AI is shadow IT with a difference: the information does not just sit in an unapproved app, it is sent to a model provider under one person's settings.
Start by asking. An anonymous survey of which AI tools people use, and for what, usually finds more than any scan. Then look at:
Give people an approved tool that is as quick as the one they use now, publish a short policy that says which information may go where, and make the protections part of the tool rather than a habit.
Forge, by GradTensor, is built for this: an organisation sets the privacy rules once, personal details are masked before they reach a model, access follows projects, and every use is recorded without its content.
AI tools used for work without the organisation's approval or knowledge, such as personal ChatGPT accounts, browser extensions, or AI features inside other software.
It is a kind of shadow IT. The difference is that the information is sent to a model provider to be processed, under settings the organisation does not control.
Yes, if the organisation has not approved it. Even where the company has a business plan, work done in a personal account sits outside it.
Is it safe to upload confidential documents to ChatGPT? →A ban alone tends to make shadow AI worse, because people keep using the tools where you cannot see them. An approved tool and a clear policy work better.
A sample AI policy for employees →